TY - JOUR
T1 - Wave overtopping at berm breakwaters
T2 - Review and sensitivity analysis of prediction models
AU - Pillai, Karthika
AU - Etemad-Shahidi, Amir
AU - Lemckert, Charles
PY - 2017/2/1
Y1 - 2017/2/1
N2 - This paper reviews the available models for the estimation of mean wave overtopping rate at berm breakwaters. A sensitivity analysis was conducted on selected models in order to study the influence of input variables on estimated overtopping discharge. The dimensionless crest freeboard is the most significant factor influencing the predicted overtopping rate. The sensitivity of overtopping to wave steepness varies from being insensitive, constant, or a function of dimensionless crest freeboard across the formulae analysed. The berm width and berm level (with respect to the still water level) have lower impact on the predicted overtopping compared to that of the crest freeboard. A case study on the sensitivity of predicted overtopping was carried out on Sirevag and Bakkafjordur berm breakwaters and it illustrated that the existing models are most sensitive to the variables of dimensionless crest freeboard, when it is greater than 1.0; and dimensionless berm width, when it is greater than 2.0. Additionally, the case study demonstrated inconsistencies among the models for predicted overtopping. The sensitivities of the estimated overtopping rates to the governing variables were compared with those obtained from experimental data. Among the models, the sensitivity estimations using the artificial neural network of Van Gent et al. (2007) [58] and the Lykke Andersen (2006) [32] formula were found to be in more reasonable agreement with those of the experimental data. The Van der Meer and Janssen (1994) [56] formula showed oversensitivity to the major governing variables. The results of this study throws light on the disparities in accounting the influence of variables, in the estimated overtopping rate at berm breakwaters, using the existing prediction models.
AB - This paper reviews the available models for the estimation of mean wave overtopping rate at berm breakwaters. A sensitivity analysis was conducted on selected models in order to study the influence of input variables on estimated overtopping discharge. The dimensionless crest freeboard is the most significant factor influencing the predicted overtopping rate. The sensitivity of overtopping to wave steepness varies from being insensitive, constant, or a function of dimensionless crest freeboard across the formulae analysed. The berm width and berm level (with respect to the still water level) have lower impact on the predicted overtopping compared to that of the crest freeboard. A case study on the sensitivity of predicted overtopping was carried out on Sirevag and Bakkafjordur berm breakwaters and it illustrated that the existing models are most sensitive to the variables of dimensionless crest freeboard, when it is greater than 1.0; and dimensionless berm width, when it is greater than 2.0. Additionally, the case study demonstrated inconsistencies among the models for predicted overtopping. The sensitivities of the estimated overtopping rates to the governing variables were compared with those obtained from experimental data. Among the models, the sensitivity estimations using the artificial neural network of Van Gent et al. (2007) [58] and the Lykke Andersen (2006) [32] formula were found to be in more reasonable agreement with those of the experimental data. The Van der Meer and Janssen (1994) [56] formula showed oversensitivity to the major governing variables. The results of this study throws light on the disparities in accounting the influence of variables, in the estimated overtopping rate at berm breakwaters, using the existing prediction models.
KW - Artificial neural network
KW - Berm breakwater
KW - CLASH
KW - Classification
KW - Empirical formula
KW - Sensitivity analysis
KW - Wave overtopping
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84996922123&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2016.11.003
DO - 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2016.11.003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84996922123
SN - 0378-3839
VL - 120
SP - 1
EP - 21
JO - Coastal Engineering
JF - Coastal Engineering
ER -