‘We haven’t even buried the dead yet’

Ethics of discursive contestation in a crisis situation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Disasters are often described as exceptional moments that demand global solidarity. A ‘state of humanitarian exception’ emerges as citizens foreground norms of compassion and cooperation while contestatory discourse – the argumentative, blame-seeking and fault-finding forms of speech – are stigmatized as inappropriate interventions in a society seeking to recover from a distressful crisis situation. This article critically unpacks these representations of post-disaster situations empirically and normatively. By analysing the discussions in the public sphere over the first 100 days after Typhoon Haiyan battered Central Philippines, the article examines the moral force behind the ‘discourse of compassion’ and its ‘ethical boundary work’ that places the ‘discourse of contestation’ outside the scope of acceptable conduct. It proposes that the discourse of compassion’s ethical boundary work is only democratically acceptable when one takes a short view of a crisis situation. Drawing on deliberative democracy theory, the article argues for the importance of contestatory discourse in fostering inclusive discourse formation and ensuring that the state of humanitarian exception does not become the rule.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1010-1030
Number of pages21
JournalCurrent Sociology
Volume65
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

moral philosophy
discourse
disaster
deliberative democracy
Philippines
solidarity
workplace
citizen
demand

Cite this

@article{6f7160235a5d4f47931e7cd25b34c52a,
title = "‘We haven’t even buried the dead yet’: Ethics of discursive contestation in a crisis situation",
abstract = "Disasters are often described as exceptional moments that demand global solidarity. A ‘state of humanitarian exception’ emerges as citizens foreground norms of compassion and cooperation while contestatory discourse – the argumentative, blame-seeking and fault-finding forms of speech – are stigmatized as inappropriate interventions in a society seeking to recover from a distressful crisis situation. This article critically unpacks these representations of post-disaster situations empirically and normatively. By analysing the discussions in the public sphere over the first 100 days after Typhoon Haiyan battered Central Philippines, the article examines the moral force behind the ‘discourse of compassion’ and its ‘ethical boundary work’ that places the ‘discourse of contestation’ outside the scope of acceptable conduct. It proposes that the discourse of compassion’s ethical boundary work is only democratically acceptable when one takes a short view of a crisis situation. Drawing on deliberative democracy theory, the article argues for the importance of contestatory discourse in fostering inclusive discourse formation and ensuring that the state of humanitarian exception does not become the rule.",
keywords = "Deliberative democracy, discourse analysis, disasters, public sphere, social media",
author = "Nicole CURATO",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0011392116651662",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "1010--1030",
journal = "Current Sociology",
issn = "0011-3921",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "7",

}

‘We haven’t even buried the dead yet’ : Ethics of discursive contestation in a crisis situation. / CURATO, Nicole.

In: Current Sociology, Vol. 65, No. 7, 01.11.2017, p. 1010-1030.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘We haven’t even buried the dead yet’

T2 - Ethics of discursive contestation in a crisis situation

AU - CURATO, Nicole

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - Disasters are often described as exceptional moments that demand global solidarity. A ‘state of humanitarian exception’ emerges as citizens foreground norms of compassion and cooperation while contestatory discourse – the argumentative, blame-seeking and fault-finding forms of speech – are stigmatized as inappropriate interventions in a society seeking to recover from a distressful crisis situation. This article critically unpacks these representations of post-disaster situations empirically and normatively. By analysing the discussions in the public sphere over the first 100 days after Typhoon Haiyan battered Central Philippines, the article examines the moral force behind the ‘discourse of compassion’ and its ‘ethical boundary work’ that places the ‘discourse of contestation’ outside the scope of acceptable conduct. It proposes that the discourse of compassion’s ethical boundary work is only democratically acceptable when one takes a short view of a crisis situation. Drawing on deliberative democracy theory, the article argues for the importance of contestatory discourse in fostering inclusive discourse formation and ensuring that the state of humanitarian exception does not become the rule.

AB - Disasters are often described as exceptional moments that demand global solidarity. A ‘state of humanitarian exception’ emerges as citizens foreground norms of compassion and cooperation while contestatory discourse – the argumentative, blame-seeking and fault-finding forms of speech – are stigmatized as inappropriate interventions in a society seeking to recover from a distressful crisis situation. This article critically unpacks these representations of post-disaster situations empirically and normatively. By analysing the discussions in the public sphere over the first 100 days after Typhoon Haiyan battered Central Philippines, the article examines the moral force behind the ‘discourse of compassion’ and its ‘ethical boundary work’ that places the ‘discourse of contestation’ outside the scope of acceptable conduct. It proposes that the discourse of compassion’s ethical boundary work is only democratically acceptable when one takes a short view of a crisis situation. Drawing on deliberative democracy theory, the article argues for the importance of contestatory discourse in fostering inclusive discourse formation and ensuring that the state of humanitarian exception does not become the rule.

KW - Deliberative democracy

KW - discourse analysis

KW - disasters

KW - public sphere

KW - social media

UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DE150101866

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031085922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/we-havent-even-buried-dead-ethics-discursive-contestation-crisis-situation

U2 - 10.1177/0011392116651662

DO - 10.1177/0011392116651662

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 1010

EP - 1030

JO - Current Sociology

JF - Current Sociology

SN - 0011-3921

IS - 7

ER -