Weaving common threads in environmental causal assessment methods: Toward an ideal method for rapid evidence synthesis

Angus Webb, K. Schofield, M. Peat, S.B. Norton, S.J. Nichols, A. Melcher

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Accurate and informative methods for evidence synthesis that are also simple and inexpensive to implement would greatly increase our ability to use scientific research results to better manage natural environments. Across the world, ressure to use evidence-based environmental management is increasing, but little guidance exists as to what ‘evidence-based’ actually means. Methods for systematic review of literature evidence have been modified from those used in medical research, but the effort involved in using these methods means that they have not been widely adopted. We compared 3 independently developed approaches to ‘rapid evidence synthesis’ methods developed in an attempt to improve efficiency and responsiveness compared to standard methods for systematic review. Each method has features that should be included in an ideal rapid evidence-synthesis method and has potential for further development. Increasing standardization of methods for evidence extraction, quality assessment, and synthesis increases the transparency and repeatability of the results obtained. However, the most important consideration is that the methods are fit for purpose; i.e., that each method is good enough to do the job required. The methods presented in this BRIDGES cluster, and potentially a combined method derived from them, could reduce the effort and cost of evidence synthesis to the scales required for management decisions.
    Original languageUndefined
    Pages (from-to)250-256
    Number of pages7
    JournalFreshwater Science
    Volume36
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Cite this

    Webb, Angus ; Schofield, K. ; Peat, M. ; Norton, S.B. ; Nichols, S.J. ; Melcher, A. / Weaving common threads in environmental causal assessment methods: Toward an ideal method for rapid evidence synthesis. In: Freshwater Science. 2017 ; Vol. 36, No. 1. pp. 250-256.
    @article{d0b9ebab30504bcf9af99f57ffc063be,
    title = "Weaving common threads in environmental causal assessment methods: Toward an ideal method for rapid evidence synthesis",
    abstract = "Accurate and informative methods for evidence synthesis that are also simple and inexpensive to implement would greatly increase our ability to use scientific research results to better manage natural environments. Across the world, ressure to use evidence-based environmental management is increasing, but little guidance exists as to what ‘evidence-based’ actually means. Methods for systematic review of literature evidence have been modified from those used in medical research, but the effort involved in using these methods means that they have not been widely adopted. We compared 3 independently developed approaches to ‘rapid evidence synthesis’ methods developed in an attempt to improve efficiency and responsiveness compared to standard methods for systematic review. Each method has features that should be included in an ideal rapid evidence-synthesis method and has potential for further development. Increasing standardization of methods for evidence extraction, quality assessment, and synthesis increases the transparency and repeatability of the results obtained. However, the most important consideration is that the methods are fit for purpose; i.e., that each method is good enough to do the job required. The methods presented in this BRIDGES cluster, and potentially a combined method derived from them, could reduce the effort and cost of evidence synthesis to the scales required for management decisions.",
    author = "Angus Webb and K. Schofield and M. Peat and S.B. Norton and S.J. Nichols and A. Melcher",
    note = "cited By 3",
    year = "2017",
    doi = "10.1086/690449",
    language = "Undefined",
    volume = "36",
    pages = "250--256",
    journal = "Journal of the North American Benthological Society",
    issn = "2161-9565",
    publisher = "The Society for Freshwater Science",
    number = "1",

    }

    Weaving common threads in environmental causal assessment methods: Toward an ideal method for rapid evidence synthesis. / Webb, Angus; Schofield, K.; Peat, M.; Norton, S.B.; Nichols, S.J.; Melcher, A.

    In: Freshwater Science, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2017, p. 250-256.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Weaving common threads in environmental causal assessment methods: Toward an ideal method for rapid evidence synthesis

    AU - Webb, Angus

    AU - Schofield, K.

    AU - Peat, M.

    AU - Norton, S.B.

    AU - Nichols, S.J.

    AU - Melcher, A.

    N1 - cited By 3

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - Accurate and informative methods for evidence synthesis that are also simple and inexpensive to implement would greatly increase our ability to use scientific research results to better manage natural environments. Across the world, ressure to use evidence-based environmental management is increasing, but little guidance exists as to what ‘evidence-based’ actually means. Methods for systematic review of literature evidence have been modified from those used in medical research, but the effort involved in using these methods means that they have not been widely adopted. We compared 3 independently developed approaches to ‘rapid evidence synthesis’ methods developed in an attempt to improve efficiency and responsiveness compared to standard methods for systematic review. Each method has features that should be included in an ideal rapid evidence-synthesis method and has potential for further development. Increasing standardization of methods for evidence extraction, quality assessment, and synthesis increases the transparency and repeatability of the results obtained. However, the most important consideration is that the methods are fit for purpose; i.e., that each method is good enough to do the job required. The methods presented in this BRIDGES cluster, and potentially a combined method derived from them, could reduce the effort and cost of evidence synthesis to the scales required for management decisions.

    AB - Accurate and informative methods for evidence synthesis that are also simple and inexpensive to implement would greatly increase our ability to use scientific research results to better manage natural environments. Across the world, ressure to use evidence-based environmental management is increasing, but little guidance exists as to what ‘evidence-based’ actually means. Methods for systematic review of literature evidence have been modified from those used in medical research, but the effort involved in using these methods means that they have not been widely adopted. We compared 3 independently developed approaches to ‘rapid evidence synthesis’ methods developed in an attempt to improve efficiency and responsiveness compared to standard methods for systematic review. Each method has features that should be included in an ideal rapid evidence-synthesis method and has potential for further development. Increasing standardization of methods for evidence extraction, quality assessment, and synthesis increases the transparency and repeatability of the results obtained. However, the most important consideration is that the methods are fit for purpose; i.e., that each method is good enough to do the job required. The methods presented in this BRIDGES cluster, and potentially a combined method derived from them, could reduce the effort and cost of evidence synthesis to the scales required for management decisions.

    U2 - 10.1086/690449

    DO - 10.1086/690449

    M3 - Article

    VL - 36

    SP - 250

    EP - 256

    JO - Journal of the North American Benthological Society

    JF - Journal of the North American Benthological Society

    SN - 2161-9565

    IS - 1

    ER -