Abstract
As a decentralised virtual community, Anonymous has been characterised by its oppositional tendencies. Helped by a collective persona and horizontal management structure, Anonymous has facilitated a myriad of differentiated agenda. However, we can observe a distinct change in its participatory form over time. So, while Anonymous, more broadly, functions as a virtual community, its means of engagement has shifted from a social movement to a decentralised cell network. This article explores the relationship between these changes, and its evolution as a virtual community. Drawing upon Iriberri and Leroy’s [(2009) “A Life-Cycle Perspective on Online Community Success.” ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 41 (2): 1–29] life cycle framework, the article maps Anonymous’ development and identifies the structural changes that have led to this transformation in its modes of participation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 168-184 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Policy Studies |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What Anonymous can tell us about the relationship between virtual community structure and participatory form'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver