TY - JOUR
T1 - What can my body do for me? Guided body-functionality mirror gazing task improved college women’s body appreciation and body functionality orientation
AU - Brooks, Julia
AU - Walker, D. Catherine
AU - Murray, Kristen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2023/5/19
Y1 - 2023/5/19
N2 - Objective: Focusing on body functionality–what the body can do–may benefit women’s body image. This pilot study examined the effects of focusing on body functionality appreciation during an audio-guided mirror gazing task (F-MGT). Participants: 101 college women, M(SD)AGE = 19.49(1.31), were alternately assigned to F-MGT or a comparison with no guidance on how to examine the body, directed attention mirror gazing task (DA-MGT). Methods: Participants self-reported pre- and post-MGT body appreciation, state appearance satisfaction, and orientation to and satisfaction with physical functionality. Results: Group interactions were significant for body appreciation and functionality orientation. DA-MGT decreased body appreciation from pre- to post-MGT; F-MGT did not change. There were no significant interactions in post-MGT state appearance satisfaction or functionality satisfaction, though state appearance satisfaction increased significantly in F-MGT. Conclusions: Integrating body functionality may buffer against harmful effects of mirror gazing. Given F-MGT’s brevity, additional work must assess its potential as an intervention technique.
AB - Objective: Focusing on body functionality–what the body can do–may benefit women’s body image. This pilot study examined the effects of focusing on body functionality appreciation during an audio-guided mirror gazing task (F-MGT). Participants: 101 college women, M(SD)AGE = 19.49(1.31), were alternately assigned to F-MGT or a comparison with no guidance on how to examine the body, directed attention mirror gazing task (DA-MGT). Methods: Participants self-reported pre- and post-MGT body appreciation, state appearance satisfaction, and orientation to and satisfaction with physical functionality. Results: Group interactions were significant for body appreciation and functionality orientation. DA-MGT decreased body appreciation from pre- to post-MGT; F-MGT did not change. There were no significant interactions in post-MGT state appearance satisfaction or functionality satisfaction, though state appearance satisfaction increased significantly in F-MGT. Conclusions: Integrating body functionality may buffer against harmful effects of mirror gazing. Given F-MGT’s brevity, additional work must assess its potential as an intervention technique.
KW - Appearance satisfaction
KW - body appreciation
KW - body functionality
KW - body image
KW - mirror gazing task
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85159699403&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/07448481.2023.2209195
DO - 10.1080/07448481.2023.2209195
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85159699403
SN - 0744-8481
SP - 1
EP - 10
JO - Journal of American College Health
JF - Journal of American College Health
ER -