What is my walking neighbourhood? A pilot study of English adults' definitions of their local walking neighbourhoods

Graham Smith, Christopher Gidlow, Rachel Davey, Charles Foster

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    68 Citations (Scopus)
    2 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background: Existing measures of perceptions of the environment associated with walking commonly rely on providing a definition of 'neighbourhood', e.g. 1 mile area around the home. We have little understanding of how these examples relate with adults' own geographical definitions of their neighbourhood area. Our pilot study examined the congruence between definitions used in environmental questionnaires and adults' own definitions of neighbourhood. Methods: We conducted 58 face-to-face interviews with participants randomly selected from 10 areas of Stoke-on- Trent, England. Participants were shown printed maps showing their local area with road names and places of interest (e.g. shops, services, green space) and were asked: (i) to recall usual walking destinations (from their home); (ii) to draw their 'neighbourhood walking area' on the map. Annotated maps were scanned back into GIS for analysis. Results: When asked to draw their 'neighbourhood' boundary, the resulting area drawn by participants on average represented only 16 ± 20% of the commonly used total straight-line buffer of 1 mile (or 1.6 km) with a range of 0.3% to 111%. Even when repeated using a network buffer (rather than straight-line) the same comparison resulted in a mean of 36% (± 47%) and a range of 0.6 to 245%. Conclusions: We found that adults' interpretation of their neighbourhood area does not appear to relate accurately to the definitions typically used in research into environmental perceptions and walking. This mis-match warrants further investigation as definitions used in existing measures may be consistently misclassifying perceived local walking neighbourhoods.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)34-41
    Number of pages8
    JournalThe International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
    Volume7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Fingerprint

    Walking
    Buffers
    England
    Names
    Interviews
    Research

    Cite this

    @article{ec1a8f2fadaa44678d74badc1b0bc5bb,
    title = "What is my walking neighbourhood? A pilot study of English adults' definitions of their local walking neighbourhoods",
    abstract = "Background: Existing measures of perceptions of the environment associated with walking commonly rely on providing a definition of 'neighbourhood', e.g. 1 mile area around the home. We have little understanding of how these examples relate with adults' own geographical definitions of their neighbourhood area. Our pilot study examined the congruence between definitions used in environmental questionnaires and adults' own definitions of neighbourhood. Methods: We conducted 58 face-to-face interviews with participants randomly selected from 10 areas of Stoke-on- Trent, England. Participants were shown printed maps showing their local area with road names and places of interest (e.g. shops, services, green space) and were asked: (i) to recall usual walking destinations (from their home); (ii) to draw their 'neighbourhood walking area' on the map. Annotated maps were scanned back into GIS for analysis. Results: When asked to draw their 'neighbourhood' boundary, the resulting area drawn by participants on average represented only 16 ± 20{\%} of the commonly used total straight-line buffer of 1 mile (or 1.6 km) with a range of 0.3{\%} to 111{\%}. Even when repeated using a network buffer (rather than straight-line) the same comparison resulted in a mean of 36{\%} (± 47{\%}) and a range of 0.6 to 245{\%}. Conclusions: We found that adults' interpretation of their neighbourhood area does not appear to relate accurately to the definitions typically used in research into environmental perceptions and walking. This mis-match warrants further investigation as definitions used in existing measures may be consistently misclassifying perceived local walking neighbourhoods.",
    author = "Graham Smith and Christopher Gidlow and Rachel Davey and Charles Foster",
    year = "2010",
    doi = "10.1186/1479-5868-7-34",
    language = "English",
    volume = "7",
    pages = "34--41",
    journal = "The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity",
    issn = "1479-5868",
    publisher = "BioMed Central",

    }

    What is my walking neighbourhood? A pilot study of English adults' definitions of their local walking neighbourhoods. / Smith, Graham; Gidlow, Christopher; Davey, Rachel; Foster, Charles.

    In: The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Vol. 7, 2010, p. 34-41.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - What is my walking neighbourhood? A pilot study of English adults' definitions of their local walking neighbourhoods

    AU - Smith, Graham

    AU - Gidlow, Christopher

    AU - Davey, Rachel

    AU - Foster, Charles

    PY - 2010

    Y1 - 2010

    N2 - Background: Existing measures of perceptions of the environment associated with walking commonly rely on providing a definition of 'neighbourhood', e.g. 1 mile area around the home. We have little understanding of how these examples relate with adults' own geographical definitions of their neighbourhood area. Our pilot study examined the congruence between definitions used in environmental questionnaires and adults' own definitions of neighbourhood. Methods: We conducted 58 face-to-face interviews with participants randomly selected from 10 areas of Stoke-on- Trent, England. Participants were shown printed maps showing their local area with road names and places of interest (e.g. shops, services, green space) and were asked: (i) to recall usual walking destinations (from their home); (ii) to draw their 'neighbourhood walking area' on the map. Annotated maps were scanned back into GIS for analysis. Results: When asked to draw their 'neighbourhood' boundary, the resulting area drawn by participants on average represented only 16 ± 20% of the commonly used total straight-line buffer of 1 mile (or 1.6 km) with a range of 0.3% to 111%. Even when repeated using a network buffer (rather than straight-line) the same comparison resulted in a mean of 36% (± 47%) and a range of 0.6 to 245%. Conclusions: We found that adults' interpretation of their neighbourhood area does not appear to relate accurately to the definitions typically used in research into environmental perceptions and walking. This mis-match warrants further investigation as definitions used in existing measures may be consistently misclassifying perceived local walking neighbourhoods.

    AB - Background: Existing measures of perceptions of the environment associated with walking commonly rely on providing a definition of 'neighbourhood', e.g. 1 mile area around the home. We have little understanding of how these examples relate with adults' own geographical definitions of their neighbourhood area. Our pilot study examined the congruence between definitions used in environmental questionnaires and adults' own definitions of neighbourhood. Methods: We conducted 58 face-to-face interviews with participants randomly selected from 10 areas of Stoke-on- Trent, England. Participants were shown printed maps showing their local area with road names and places of interest (e.g. shops, services, green space) and were asked: (i) to recall usual walking destinations (from their home); (ii) to draw their 'neighbourhood walking area' on the map. Annotated maps were scanned back into GIS for analysis. Results: When asked to draw their 'neighbourhood' boundary, the resulting area drawn by participants on average represented only 16 ± 20% of the commonly used total straight-line buffer of 1 mile (or 1.6 km) with a range of 0.3% to 111%. Even when repeated using a network buffer (rather than straight-line) the same comparison resulted in a mean of 36% (± 47%) and a range of 0.6 to 245%. Conclusions: We found that adults' interpretation of their neighbourhood area does not appear to relate accurately to the definitions typically used in research into environmental perceptions and walking. This mis-match warrants further investigation as definitions used in existing measures may be consistently misclassifying perceived local walking neighbourhoods.

    U2 - 10.1186/1479-5868-7-34

    DO - 10.1186/1479-5868-7-34

    M3 - Article

    VL - 7

    SP - 34

    EP - 41

    JO - The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

    JF - The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

    SN - 1479-5868

    ER -