TY - JOUR
T1 - What is the effect of strength and conditioning training interventions on mechanical stiffness?
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Bandara, Udana
AU - Coltman, Celeste E.
AU - Portus, Marc
AU - Feros, Simon A.
AU - Talukdar, Kaushik
AU - Spratford, Wayne A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Mechanical stiffness, including vertical (Kvert), leg (Kleg), and joint (Kjoint) stiffness, is an important mechanical determinant associated with neuromuscular and athletic performances that influences force production and energy transformation. Strength and conditioning (S&C) coaches employ diverse training methods to improve athletes’ mechanical stiffness. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effect of S&C interventions on mechanical stiffness. A comprehensive search across six electronic databases, including CINAHL, COCHRANE LIBRARY, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, SPORT DISCUSS, and WEB OF SCIENCE, identified 23 studies (40 intervention groups, 632 subjects) for the systematic review, with 12 studies (20 intervention groups, 420 subjects) included in the pre-post or/and control-intervention random effects meta-analysis. Plyometric or jump-related training had a significant and small effect on Kleg (SMD = 0.38; Z = 2.61, p = 0.009). When plyometrics training was combined with balance training, a significant and large effect on Kleg occurred (SMD = 0.80; Z = 2.93, p = 0.003). Resisted sprint training had a significant and large effect on Kleg (SMD = 0.80; Z = 6.07, p < 0.0001). These findings provide initial guidance for S&C coaches in designing programs to enhance mechanical stiffness. Future research directions are suggested to further explore the impact of S&C interventions on stiffness.
AB - Mechanical stiffness, including vertical (Kvert), leg (Kleg), and joint (Kjoint) stiffness, is an important mechanical determinant associated with neuromuscular and athletic performances that influences force production and energy transformation. Strength and conditioning (S&C) coaches employ diverse training methods to improve athletes’ mechanical stiffness. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effect of S&C interventions on mechanical stiffness. A comprehensive search across six electronic databases, including CINAHL, COCHRANE LIBRARY, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, SPORT DISCUSS, and WEB OF SCIENCE, identified 23 studies (40 intervention groups, 632 subjects) for the systematic review, with 12 studies (20 intervention groups, 420 subjects) included in the pre-post or/and control-intervention random effects meta-analysis. Plyometric or jump-related training had a significant and small effect on Kleg (SMD = 0.38; Z = 2.61, p = 0.009). When plyometrics training was combined with balance training, a significant and large effect on Kleg occurred (SMD = 0.80; Z = 2.93, p = 0.003). Resisted sprint training had a significant and large effect on Kleg (SMD = 0.80; Z = 6.07, p < 0.0001). These findings provide initial guidance for S&C coaches in designing programs to enhance mechanical stiffness. Future research directions are suggested to further explore the impact of S&C interventions on stiffness.
KW - joint stiffness
KW - leg stiffness
KW - plyometric training
KW - resistance training
KW - strength training
KW - Vertical stiffness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105002270055&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02640414.2025.2477394
DO - 10.1080/02640414.2025.2477394
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105002270055
SN - 0264-0414
VL - 43
SP - 776
EP - 795
JO - Journal of Sports Sciences
JF - Journal of Sports Sciences
IS - 8
ER -