Abstract
Matthew Wood raises two important, related, issues in his article: first, the extent to which a pluralistic Political Science is desirable and possible; and, second, the extent to which, and the way in which, the relevance of political science research, and particularly qualitative research, can be promoted. Here, we look at both issues, although the second at greater length.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 301-305 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Politics |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What is to be done? A broad church and the impact of political science research: a response to Matthew Wood'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver