"What sceptics believe”: The effects of information and deliberation on climate change scepticism

Kersty Hobson, Simon Niemeyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Scepticism about climate change now appears a pervasive social phenomenon. Research to date has examined the different forms that scepticism can take, from outright denial to general uncertainty. Less is known about what climate sceptics value and believe beyond their climate change doubt, as well as how “entrenched” such beliefs are. In response, this paper discusses research into public reactions to projected climate change in the Australian Capital Region. Using Q Methodology and qualitative data, it outlines five discourses of scepticism and explores the impact regional-scale climate scenarios and a deliberative forum had on these discourses. Results show that both forms of intervention stimulate “discourse migration” amongst research participants. However, migrations are rarely sustained, and sceptical positions are infrequently dispelled outright, suggesting the relationship between climate scepticism, broader beliefs, and the methods used to inform and debate about climate change, are pivotal to comprehending and addressing this issue
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)396-412
Number of pages17
JournalPublic Understanding of Science
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Climate Change
deliberation
Climate change
climate change
Climate
climate
discourse
Research
migration research
Uncertainty
Economics
uncertainty
migration
scenario
Skeptics
Skepticism
Deliberation
methodology
Discourse
Values

Cite this

@article{519b5f7b2e1e4d108087c22380195d09,
title = "{"}What sceptics believe”: The effects of information and deliberation on climate change scepticism",
abstract = "Scepticism about climate change now appears a pervasive social phenomenon. Research to date has examined the different forms that scepticism can take, from outright denial to general uncertainty. Less is known about what climate sceptics value and believe beyond their climate change doubt, as well as how “entrenched” such beliefs are. In response, this paper discusses research into public reactions to projected climate change in the Australian Capital Region. Using Q Methodology and qualitative data, it outlines five discourses of scepticism and explores the impact regional-scale climate scenarios and a deliberative forum had on these discourses. Results show that both forms of intervention stimulate “discourse migration” amongst research participants. However, migrations are rarely sustained, and sceptical positions are infrequently dispelled outright, suggesting the relationship between climate scepticism, broader beliefs, and the methods used to inform and debate about climate change, are pivotal to comprehending and addressing this issue",
author = "Kersty Hobson and Simon Niemeyer",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1177/0963662511430459",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "396--412",
journal = "Public Understanding of Science",
issn = "0963-6625",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

"What sceptics believe”: The effects of information and deliberation on climate change scepticism. / Hobson, Kersty; Niemeyer, Simon.

In: Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2013, p. 396-412.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - "What sceptics believe”: The effects of information and deliberation on climate change scepticism

AU - Hobson, Kersty

AU - Niemeyer, Simon

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Scepticism about climate change now appears a pervasive social phenomenon. Research to date has examined the different forms that scepticism can take, from outright denial to general uncertainty. Less is known about what climate sceptics value and believe beyond their climate change doubt, as well as how “entrenched” such beliefs are. In response, this paper discusses research into public reactions to projected climate change in the Australian Capital Region. Using Q Methodology and qualitative data, it outlines five discourses of scepticism and explores the impact regional-scale climate scenarios and a deliberative forum had on these discourses. Results show that both forms of intervention stimulate “discourse migration” amongst research participants. However, migrations are rarely sustained, and sceptical positions are infrequently dispelled outright, suggesting the relationship between climate scepticism, broader beliefs, and the methods used to inform and debate about climate change, are pivotal to comprehending and addressing this issue

AB - Scepticism about climate change now appears a pervasive social phenomenon. Research to date has examined the different forms that scepticism can take, from outright denial to general uncertainty. Less is known about what climate sceptics value and believe beyond their climate change doubt, as well as how “entrenched” such beliefs are. In response, this paper discusses research into public reactions to projected climate change in the Australian Capital Region. Using Q Methodology and qualitative data, it outlines five discourses of scepticism and explores the impact regional-scale climate scenarios and a deliberative forum had on these discourses. Results show that both forms of intervention stimulate “discourse migration” amongst research participants. However, migrations are rarely sustained, and sceptical positions are infrequently dispelled outright, suggesting the relationship between climate scepticism, broader beliefs, and the methods used to inform and debate about climate change, are pivotal to comprehending and addressing this issue

U2 - 10.1177/0963662511430459

DO - 10.1177/0963662511430459

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 396

EP - 412

JO - Public Understanding of Science

JF - Public Understanding of Science

SN - 0963-6625

IS - 4

ER -