When Is Spillover from Marine Reserves Likely to Benefit Fisheries?

Colin D. Buxton, Klaas Hartmann, Robert Kearney, Caleb Gardner

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    32 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The net movement of individuals from marine reserves (also known as no-take marine protected areas) to the remaining fishing grounds is known as spillover and is frequently used to promote reserves to fishers on the grounds that it will benefit fisheries. Here we consider how mismanaged a fishery must be before spillover from a reserve is able to provide a net benefit for a fishery. For our model fishery, density of the species being harvested becomes higher in the reserve than in the fished area but the reduction in the density and yield of the fished area was such that the net effect of the closure was negative, except when the fishery was mismanaged. The extent to which effort had to exceed traditional management targets before reserves led to a spillover benefit varied with rates of growth and movement of the model species. In general, for well-managed fisheries, the loss of yield from the use of reserves was less for species with greater movement and slower growth. The spillover benefit became more pronounced with increasing mis-management of the stocks remaining available to the fishery. This model-based result is consistent with the literature of field-based research where a spillover benefit from reserves has only been detected when the fishery is highly depleted, often where traditional fisheries management controls are absent. We conclude that reserves in jurisdictions with well-managed fisheries are unlikely to provide a net spillover benefit.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-7
    Number of pages7
    JournalPLoS One
    Volume9
    Issue number9:e107032
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Fisheries
    fisheries
    fisheries management
    fishery resources
    conservation areas
    Growth

    Cite this

    Buxton, C. D., Hartmann, K., Kearney, R., & Gardner, C. (2014). When Is Spillover from Marine Reserves Likely to Benefit Fisheries? PLoS One, 9(9:e107032), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107032
    Buxton, Colin D. ; Hartmann, Klaas ; Kearney, Robert ; Gardner, Caleb. / When Is Spillover from Marine Reserves Likely to Benefit Fisheries?. In: PLoS One. 2014 ; Vol. 9, No. 9:e107032. pp. 1-7.
    @article{d8dda3ae9c394d91982472e7441894cf,
    title = "When Is Spillover from Marine Reserves Likely to Benefit Fisheries?",
    abstract = "The net movement of individuals from marine reserves (also known as no-take marine protected areas) to the remaining fishing grounds is known as spillover and is frequently used to promote reserves to fishers on the grounds that it will benefit fisheries. Here we consider how mismanaged a fishery must be before spillover from a reserve is able to provide a net benefit for a fishery. For our model fishery, density of the species being harvested becomes higher in the reserve than in the fished area but the reduction in the density and yield of the fished area was such that the net effect of the closure was negative, except when the fishery was mismanaged. The extent to which effort had to exceed traditional management targets before reserves led to a spillover benefit varied with rates of growth and movement of the model species. In general, for well-managed fisheries, the loss of yield from the use of reserves was less for species with greater movement and slower growth. The spillover benefit became more pronounced with increasing mis-management of the stocks remaining available to the fishery. This model-based result is consistent with the literature of field-based research where a spillover benefit from reserves has only been detected when the fishery is highly depleted, often where traditional fisheries management controls are absent. We conclude that reserves in jurisdictions with well-managed fisheries are unlikely to provide a net spillover benefit.",
    author = "Buxton, {Colin D.} and Klaas Hartmann and Robert Kearney and Caleb Gardner",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0107032",
    language = "English",
    volume = "9",
    pages = "1--7",
    journal = "PLoS One",
    issn = "1932-6203",
    publisher = "Public Library of Science",
    number = "9:e107032",

    }

    Buxton, CD, Hartmann, K, Kearney, R & Gardner, C 2014, 'When Is Spillover from Marine Reserves Likely to Benefit Fisheries?', PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 9:e107032, pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107032

    When Is Spillover from Marine Reserves Likely to Benefit Fisheries? / Buxton, Colin D.; Hartmann, Klaas; Kearney, Robert; Gardner, Caleb.

    In: PLoS One, Vol. 9, No. 9:e107032, 2014, p. 1-7.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - When Is Spillover from Marine Reserves Likely to Benefit Fisheries?

    AU - Buxton, Colin D.

    AU - Hartmann, Klaas

    AU - Kearney, Robert

    AU - Gardner, Caleb

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - The net movement of individuals from marine reserves (also known as no-take marine protected areas) to the remaining fishing grounds is known as spillover and is frequently used to promote reserves to fishers on the grounds that it will benefit fisheries. Here we consider how mismanaged a fishery must be before spillover from a reserve is able to provide a net benefit for a fishery. For our model fishery, density of the species being harvested becomes higher in the reserve than in the fished area but the reduction in the density and yield of the fished area was such that the net effect of the closure was negative, except when the fishery was mismanaged. The extent to which effort had to exceed traditional management targets before reserves led to a spillover benefit varied with rates of growth and movement of the model species. In general, for well-managed fisheries, the loss of yield from the use of reserves was less for species with greater movement and slower growth. The spillover benefit became more pronounced with increasing mis-management of the stocks remaining available to the fishery. This model-based result is consistent with the literature of field-based research where a spillover benefit from reserves has only been detected when the fishery is highly depleted, often where traditional fisheries management controls are absent. We conclude that reserves in jurisdictions with well-managed fisheries are unlikely to provide a net spillover benefit.

    AB - The net movement of individuals from marine reserves (also known as no-take marine protected areas) to the remaining fishing grounds is known as spillover and is frequently used to promote reserves to fishers on the grounds that it will benefit fisheries. Here we consider how mismanaged a fishery must be before spillover from a reserve is able to provide a net benefit for a fishery. For our model fishery, density of the species being harvested becomes higher in the reserve than in the fished area but the reduction in the density and yield of the fished area was such that the net effect of the closure was negative, except when the fishery was mismanaged. The extent to which effort had to exceed traditional management targets before reserves led to a spillover benefit varied with rates of growth and movement of the model species. In general, for well-managed fisheries, the loss of yield from the use of reserves was less for species with greater movement and slower growth. The spillover benefit became more pronounced with increasing mis-management of the stocks remaining available to the fishery. This model-based result is consistent with the literature of field-based research where a spillover benefit from reserves has only been detected when the fishery is highly depleted, often where traditional fisheries management controls are absent. We conclude that reserves in jurisdictions with well-managed fisheries are unlikely to provide a net spillover benefit.

    U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0107032

    DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0107032

    M3 - Article

    VL - 9

    SP - 1

    EP - 7

    JO - PLoS One

    JF - PLoS One

    SN - 1932-6203

    IS - 9:e107032

    ER -