TY - JOUR
T1 - When the earth doesn't stop shaking
T2 - How experiences over time influenced information needs, communication, and interpretation of aftershock information during the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence, New Zealand
AU - Becker, J. S.
AU - Potter, S. H.
AU - McBride, S. K.
AU - Wein, A.
AU - Doyle, E. E.H.
AU - Paton, D.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge the following sources who provided funding for this project: New Zealand's Ministry of Business Innovation & Employment via the Strategic Science Investment Fund, and Resilience to Nature's Challenges; and the U.S. Geological Survey who supported this work under Grant/Cooperative Agreement No. G16AC00253 . We would also like to acknowledge our participants who participated in interviews and focus groups. Finally, thanks to our research assistants Jamie Jones and Bianca Jensen who assisted with coding of the data, and two independent U.S. Geological Survey and GNS Science internal reviewers who reviewed this paper before submission.
Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge the following sources who provided funding for this project: New Zealand's Ministry of Business Innovation & Employment via the Strategic Science Investment Fund, and Resilience to Nature's Challenges; and the U.S. Geological Survey who supported this work under Grant/Cooperative Agreement No. G16AC00253. We would also like to acknowledge our participants who participated in interviews and focus groups. Finally, thanks to our research assistants Jamie Jones and Bianca Jensen who assisted with coding of the data, and two independent U.S. Geological Survey and GNS Science internal reviewers who reviewed this paper before submission.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - The Canterbury Earthquake Sequence (CES) began with the Darfield earthquake on 4 September 2010. Continual large and small aftershocks since that time have meant communities have cycled through repeated periods of impact, response and recovery. Scientific communication about aftershocks during such a prolonged sequence has faced distinct challenges. We conducted research to better understand aftershock information needs for agencies and the public, and how people interpreted and responded to such information. We found that a wide range of information was needed from basic facts about aftershocks through to more technical information, and in different formats (e.g. maps, tables, graphs, text, analogies). Information needs also evolved throughout the sequence, and differed depending on people's roles and experiences, and the phase of impact, response and recovery communities were in. Interpretation of aftershock information was influenced by a variety of factors including how understandable and relevant the information was, whether people had prior knowledge or experience of aftershocks, whether the information was personalised or contextualised, emotions and feelings, credibility and trust, and external influences. Given that such a diversity of evolving information is required, it is imperative that geoscientists strategize how to provide such information before a significant earthquake occurs.
AB - The Canterbury Earthquake Sequence (CES) began with the Darfield earthquake on 4 September 2010. Continual large and small aftershocks since that time have meant communities have cycled through repeated periods of impact, response and recovery. Scientific communication about aftershocks during such a prolonged sequence has faced distinct challenges. We conducted research to better understand aftershock information needs for agencies and the public, and how people interpreted and responded to such information. We found that a wide range of information was needed from basic facts about aftershocks through to more technical information, and in different formats (e.g. maps, tables, graphs, text, analogies). Information needs also evolved throughout the sequence, and differed depending on people's roles and experiences, and the phase of impact, response and recovery communities were in. Interpretation of aftershock information was influenced by a variety of factors including how understandable and relevant the information was, whether people had prior knowledge or experience of aftershocks, whether the information was personalised or contextualised, emotions and feelings, credibility and trust, and external influences. Given that such a diversity of evolving information is required, it is imperative that geoscientists strategize how to provide such information before a significant earthquake occurs.
KW - Aftershocks
KW - Christchurch
KW - Communication
KW - Darfield
KW - Earthquakes
KW - New Zealand
KW - Operational Earthquake Forecasting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059164168&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.12.009
DO - 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.12.009
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85059164168
SN - 2212-4209
VL - 34
SP - 397
EP - 411
JO - International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
JF - International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
ER -