Which bank? A guardian model for regulation of embryonic stem cell research in Australia.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In late 2005 the Legislation Review: Prohibition of Human Cloning Act 2002 (Cth) and the Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002 (Cth) recommended the establishment of an Australian stem cell bank. This article aims to address a lack of discussion of issues surrounding stem cell banking by suggesting possible answers to the questions of whether Australia should establish a stem cell bank and what its underlying philosophy and functions should be. Answers are developed through an analysis of regulatory, scientific and intellectual property issues relating to embryonic stem cell research in the United Kingdom, United States and Australia. This includes a detailed analysis of the United Kingdom Stem Cell Bank. It is argued that a "guardian" model stem cell bank should be established in Australia. This bank would aim to promote the maximum public benefit from human embryonic stem cell research by providing careful regulatory oversight and addressing ethical issues, while also facilitating research by addressing practical scientific concerns and intellectual property issues.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-76
Number of pages32
JournalJournal of Law and Medicine
Volume15
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Stem Cell Research
Stem Cells
Intellectual Property
Embryo Research
Legislation
Ethics
Organism Cloning
Research

Cite this

@article{343c6c473e6d4af2ad54a58170d14e24,
title = "Which bank? A guardian model for regulation of embryonic stem cell research in Australia.",
abstract = "In late 2005 the Legislation Review: Prohibition of Human Cloning Act 2002 (Cth) and the Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002 (Cth) recommended the establishment of an Australian stem cell bank. This article aims to address a lack of discussion of issues surrounding stem cell banking by suggesting possible answers to the questions of whether Australia should establish a stem cell bank and what its underlying philosophy and functions should be. Answers are developed through an analysis of regulatory, scientific and intellectual property issues relating to embryonic stem cell research in the United Kingdom, United States and Australia. This includes a detailed analysis of the United Kingdom Stem Cell Bank. It is argued that a {"}guardian{"} model stem cell bank should be established in Australia. This bank would aim to promote the maximum public benefit from human embryonic stem cell research by providing careful regulatory oversight and addressing ethical issues, while also facilitating research by addressing practical scientific concerns and intellectual property issues.",
author = "Alison McLennan",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "45--76",
journal = "Journal of Law and Medicine",
issn = "1320-159X",
publisher = "Thomson Head Office",
number = "1",

}

Which bank? A guardian model for regulation of embryonic stem cell research in Australia. / McLennan, Alison.

In: Journal of Law and Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.08.2007, p. 45-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Which bank? A guardian model for regulation of embryonic stem cell research in Australia.

AU - McLennan, Alison

PY - 2007/8/1

Y1 - 2007/8/1

N2 - In late 2005 the Legislation Review: Prohibition of Human Cloning Act 2002 (Cth) and the Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002 (Cth) recommended the establishment of an Australian stem cell bank. This article aims to address a lack of discussion of issues surrounding stem cell banking by suggesting possible answers to the questions of whether Australia should establish a stem cell bank and what its underlying philosophy and functions should be. Answers are developed through an analysis of regulatory, scientific and intellectual property issues relating to embryonic stem cell research in the United Kingdom, United States and Australia. This includes a detailed analysis of the United Kingdom Stem Cell Bank. It is argued that a "guardian" model stem cell bank should be established in Australia. This bank would aim to promote the maximum public benefit from human embryonic stem cell research by providing careful regulatory oversight and addressing ethical issues, while also facilitating research by addressing practical scientific concerns and intellectual property issues.

AB - In late 2005 the Legislation Review: Prohibition of Human Cloning Act 2002 (Cth) and the Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002 (Cth) recommended the establishment of an Australian stem cell bank. This article aims to address a lack of discussion of issues surrounding stem cell banking by suggesting possible answers to the questions of whether Australia should establish a stem cell bank and what its underlying philosophy and functions should be. Answers are developed through an analysis of regulatory, scientific and intellectual property issues relating to embryonic stem cell research in the United Kingdom, United States and Australia. This includes a detailed analysis of the United Kingdom Stem Cell Bank. It is argued that a "guardian" model stem cell bank should be established in Australia. This bank would aim to promote the maximum public benefit from human embryonic stem cell research by providing careful regulatory oversight and addressing ethical issues, while also facilitating research by addressing practical scientific concerns and intellectual property issues.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35848964364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 45

EP - 76

JO - Journal of Law and Medicine

JF - Journal of Law and Medicine

SN - 1320-159X

IS - 1

ER -