Which learning activities enhance physiotherapy practice? A systematic review protocol of quantitative and qualitative studies

Edmund Leahy, Lucy Chipchase, Felicity Blackstock

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background: Learning activities are fundamental for the development of expertise in physiotherapy practice. Continuing professional development (CPD) encompasses formal and informal learning activities undertaken by physiotherapists. Identifying the most efficient and effective learning activities is essential to enable the profession to assimilate research findings and improve clinical skills to ensure the most efficacious care for clients. To date, systematic reviews on the effectiveness of CPD provide limited guidance on the most efficacious models of professional development for physiotherapists. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate which learning activities enhance physiotherapy practice. Methods: A search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO (Psychological Abstracts), PEDro, Cochrane Library, AMED and Educational Resources and Information Center (ERIC) will be completed. Citation searching and reference list searching will be undertaken to locate additional studies. Quantitative and qualitative studies will be included if they examine the impact of learning activities on clinician's behaviour, attitude, knowledge, beliefs, skills, self-efficacy, work satisfaction and patient outcomes. Risk of bias will be assessed by two independent researchers. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) and Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (CERQual) will be used to synthesise results where a meta-analysis is possible. Where a meta-analysis is not possible, a narrative synthesis will be conducted. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42016050157

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number83
    Pages (from-to)1-7
    Number of pages7
    JournalSystematic Reviews
    Volume6
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 17 Apr 2017

    Fingerprint

    Learning
    Physical Therapists
    Meta-Analysis
    Information Centers
    Clinical Competence
    Job Satisfaction
    Qualitative Research
    Self Efficacy
    MEDLINE
    Libraries
    Nursing
    Research Personnel
    Psychology
    Health
    Research

    Cite this

    Leahy, Edmund ; Chipchase, Lucy ; Blackstock, Felicity. / Which learning activities enhance physiotherapy practice? A systematic review protocol of quantitative and qualitative studies. In: Systematic Reviews. 2017 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 1-7.
    @article{228cd4c0999941809e9cfc2c26af6277,
    title = "Which learning activities enhance physiotherapy practice? A systematic review protocol of quantitative and qualitative studies",
    abstract = "Background: Learning activities are fundamental for the development of expertise in physiotherapy practice. Continuing professional development (CPD) encompasses formal and informal learning activities undertaken by physiotherapists. Identifying the most efficient and effective learning activities is essential to enable the profession to assimilate research findings and improve clinical skills to ensure the most efficacious care for clients. To date, systematic reviews on the effectiveness of CPD provide limited guidance on the most efficacious models of professional development for physiotherapists. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate which learning activities enhance physiotherapy practice. Methods: A search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO (Psychological Abstracts), PEDro, Cochrane Library, AMED and Educational Resources and Information Center (ERIC) will be completed. Citation searching and reference list searching will be undertaken to locate additional studies. Quantitative and qualitative studies will be included if they examine the impact of learning activities on clinician's behaviour, attitude, knowledge, beliefs, skills, self-efficacy, work satisfaction and patient outcomes. Risk of bias will be assessed by two independent researchers. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) and Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (CERQual) will be used to synthesise results where a meta-analysis is possible. Where a meta-analysis is not possible, a narrative synthesis will be conducted. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42016050157",
    keywords = "Education, Expertise, Knowledge translation, Physiotherapy, Professional development, Protocol, Systematic review",
    author = "Edmund Leahy and Lucy Chipchase and Felicity Blackstock",
    year = "2017",
    month = "4",
    day = "17",
    doi = "10.1186/s13643-017-0475-x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "6",
    pages = "1--7",
    journal = "Systematic Reviews",
    issn = "2046-4053",
    publisher = "BioMed Central",
    number = "1",

    }

    Which learning activities enhance physiotherapy practice? A systematic review protocol of quantitative and qualitative studies. / Leahy, Edmund; Chipchase, Lucy; Blackstock, Felicity.

    In: Systematic Reviews, Vol. 6, No. 1, 83, 17.04.2017, p. 1-7.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Which learning activities enhance physiotherapy practice? A systematic review protocol of quantitative and qualitative studies

    AU - Leahy, Edmund

    AU - Chipchase, Lucy

    AU - Blackstock, Felicity

    PY - 2017/4/17

    Y1 - 2017/4/17

    N2 - Background: Learning activities are fundamental for the development of expertise in physiotherapy practice. Continuing professional development (CPD) encompasses formal and informal learning activities undertaken by physiotherapists. Identifying the most efficient and effective learning activities is essential to enable the profession to assimilate research findings and improve clinical skills to ensure the most efficacious care for clients. To date, systematic reviews on the effectiveness of CPD provide limited guidance on the most efficacious models of professional development for physiotherapists. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate which learning activities enhance physiotherapy practice. Methods: A search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO (Psychological Abstracts), PEDro, Cochrane Library, AMED and Educational Resources and Information Center (ERIC) will be completed. Citation searching and reference list searching will be undertaken to locate additional studies. Quantitative and qualitative studies will be included if they examine the impact of learning activities on clinician's behaviour, attitude, knowledge, beliefs, skills, self-efficacy, work satisfaction and patient outcomes. Risk of bias will be assessed by two independent researchers. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) and Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (CERQual) will be used to synthesise results where a meta-analysis is possible. Where a meta-analysis is not possible, a narrative synthesis will be conducted. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42016050157

    AB - Background: Learning activities are fundamental for the development of expertise in physiotherapy practice. Continuing professional development (CPD) encompasses formal and informal learning activities undertaken by physiotherapists. Identifying the most efficient and effective learning activities is essential to enable the profession to assimilate research findings and improve clinical skills to ensure the most efficacious care for clients. To date, systematic reviews on the effectiveness of CPD provide limited guidance on the most efficacious models of professional development for physiotherapists. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate which learning activities enhance physiotherapy practice. Methods: A search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO (Psychological Abstracts), PEDro, Cochrane Library, AMED and Educational Resources and Information Center (ERIC) will be completed. Citation searching and reference list searching will be undertaken to locate additional studies. Quantitative and qualitative studies will be included if they examine the impact of learning activities on clinician's behaviour, attitude, knowledge, beliefs, skills, self-efficacy, work satisfaction and patient outcomes. Risk of bias will be assessed by two independent researchers. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) and Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (CERQual) will be used to synthesise results where a meta-analysis is possible. Where a meta-analysis is not possible, a narrative synthesis will be conducted. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42016050157

    KW - Education

    KW - Expertise

    KW - Knowledge translation

    KW - Physiotherapy

    KW - Professional development

    KW - Protocol

    KW - Systematic review

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018512643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1186/s13643-017-0475-x

    DO - 10.1186/s13643-017-0475-x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 6

    SP - 1

    EP - 7

    JO - Systematic Reviews

    JF - Systematic Reviews

    SN - 2046-4053

    IS - 1

    M1 - 83

    ER -