Who do growers trust? Engaging biosecurity knowledges to negotiate risk management in the north Queensland banana industry, Australia

K. Maclean, C. Farbotko, C. J. Robinson

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper considers the role of trust in biosecurity knowledge and biosecurity risk management practices. In particular, it considers how trust influences where and why biosecurity stakeholders source knowledge. Drawing on a case study of banana growers in northern Australia, we use Stern and Coleman’s (2015) framework to distinguish four different kinds of trust active in the industry: dispositional trust; rational trust; affinitive trust; and procedural trust. We show that trust may be integral to how growers source, use and adapt available biosecurity knowledge in their on-farmbiosecurity practices. We end by considering how governance approaches and strategies can better support farmers for improved biosecurity risk management outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-110
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Rural Studies
Volume67
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

risk management
governance approach
industry
management practice
stakeholder
farmer
governance

Cite this

Maclean, K. ; Farbotko, C. ; Robinson, C. J. / Who do growers trust? Engaging biosecurity knowledges to negotiate risk management in the north Queensland banana industry, Australia. In: Journal of Rural Studies. 2019 ; Vol. 67. pp. 101-110.
@article{3b9fce1a4fb94e6985a8bbd52d680da1,
title = "Who do growers trust? Engaging biosecurity knowledges to negotiate risk management in the north Queensland banana industry, Australia",
abstract = "This paper considers the role of trust in biosecurity knowledge and biosecurity risk management practices. In particular, it considers how trust influences where and why biosecurity stakeholders source knowledge. Drawing on a case study of banana growers in northern Australia, we use Stern and Coleman’s (2015) framework to distinguish four different kinds of trust active in the industry: dispositional trust; rational trust; affinitive trust; and procedural trust. We show that trust may be integral to how growers source, use and adapt available biosecurity knowledge in their on-farmbiosecurity practices. We end by considering how governance approaches and strategies can better support farmers for improved biosecurity risk management outcomes.",
author = "K. Maclean and C. Farbotko and Robinson, {C. J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.02.026",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "101--110",
journal = "Journal of Rural Studies",
issn = "0743-0167",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Maclean, K, Farbotko, C & Robinson, CJ 2019, 'Who do growers trust? Engaging biosecurity knowledges to negotiate risk management in the north Queensland banana industry, Australia', Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 67, pp. 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.02.026

Who do growers trust? Engaging biosecurity knowledges to negotiate risk management in the north Queensland banana industry, Australia. / Maclean, K.; Farbotko, C.; Robinson, C. J.

In: Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 67, 01.04.2019, p. 101-110.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who do growers trust? Engaging biosecurity knowledges to negotiate risk management in the north Queensland banana industry, Australia

AU - Maclean, K.

AU - Farbotko, C.

AU - Robinson, C. J.

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - This paper considers the role of trust in biosecurity knowledge and biosecurity risk management practices. In particular, it considers how trust influences where and why biosecurity stakeholders source knowledge. Drawing on a case study of banana growers in northern Australia, we use Stern and Coleman’s (2015) framework to distinguish four different kinds of trust active in the industry: dispositional trust; rational trust; affinitive trust; and procedural trust. We show that trust may be integral to how growers source, use and adapt available biosecurity knowledge in their on-farmbiosecurity practices. We end by considering how governance approaches and strategies can better support farmers for improved biosecurity risk management outcomes.

AB - This paper considers the role of trust in biosecurity knowledge and biosecurity risk management practices. In particular, it considers how trust influences where and why biosecurity stakeholders source knowledge. Drawing on a case study of banana growers in northern Australia, we use Stern and Coleman’s (2015) framework to distinguish four different kinds of trust active in the industry: dispositional trust; rational trust; affinitive trust; and procedural trust. We show that trust may be integral to how growers source, use and adapt available biosecurity knowledge in their on-farmbiosecurity practices. We end by considering how governance approaches and strategies can better support farmers for improved biosecurity risk management outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062446133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.02.026

DO - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.02.026

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 101

EP - 110

JO - Journal of Rural Studies

JF - Journal of Rural Studies

SN - 0743-0167

ER -

Maclean K, Farbotko C, Robinson CJ. Who do growers trust? Engaging biosecurity knowledges to negotiate risk management in the north Queensland banana industry, Australia. Journal of Rural Studies. 2019 Apr 1;67:101-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.02.026

Access to Document