Who should pay for local streets? Who does? Survey of New Jersey municipalities

Carl E. Peters, Jonathan R. Peters, Cameron Gordon

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Many trips, if not most, begin and end on local roads. Thus, there is a system aspect to such roads in the sense that local streets can have spillover benefits and costs for larger trips that use the total road network. Yet curbs and sidewalks and local streets are typically almost entirely provided locally in the United States. There are historical and institutional reasons for this fact and great variation of practice across jurisdictions. But two key planning and policy questions arise. Who pays for sidewalks and local streets? And who should pay? To find some empirical answers to those questions, this paper reports on a 2015 New Jersey Society of Municipal Engineers survey, developed by one of the authors, to collect data on the prevalence of curb and sidewalk installations on municipal streets. The survey explored the management and operational practices that municipal governments use to maintain their local transportation infrastructure. The results indicate that local streets in New Jersey are heavily funded and managed by localities with little focus on any broader network effects that might accrue outside those localities. Analysis of the data suggests a need of more than $1.2 billion annually in New Jersey, against a projected state and federal funding of roughly $100 million annually, a gap in funding that suggests the need to establish a long-term funding mechanism for local streets, curbs, and sidewalks.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)24-32
    Number of pages9
    JournalTransportation Research Record
    Volume2670
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Fingerprint

    Curbs
    Engineers
    Planning
    Costs

    Cite this

    Peters, Carl E. ; Peters, Jonathan R. ; Gordon, Cameron. / Who should pay for local streets? Who does? Survey of New Jersey municipalities. In: Transportation Research Record. 2017 ; Vol. 2670. pp. 24-32.
    @article{4cd69220b6a240b2bdcac7a3d723f84b,
    title = "Who should pay for local streets? Who does? Survey of New Jersey municipalities",
    abstract = "Many trips, if not most, begin and end on local roads. Thus, there is a system aspect to such roads in the sense that local streets can have spillover benefits and costs for larger trips that use the total road network. Yet curbs and sidewalks and local streets are typically almost entirely provided locally in the United States. There are historical and institutional reasons for this fact and great variation of practice across jurisdictions. But two key planning and policy questions arise. Who pays for sidewalks and local streets? And who should pay? To find some empirical answers to those questions, this paper reports on a 2015 New Jersey Society of Municipal Engineers survey, developed by one of the authors, to collect data on the prevalence of curb and sidewalk installations on municipal streets. The survey explored the management and operational practices that municipal governments use to maintain their local transportation infrastructure. The results indicate that local streets in New Jersey are heavily funded and managed by localities with little focus on any broader network effects that might accrue outside those localities. Analysis of the data suggests a need of more than $1.2 billion annually in New Jersey, against a projected state and federal funding of roughly $100 million annually, a gap in funding that suggests the need to establish a long-term funding mechanism for local streets, curbs, and sidewalks.",
    author = "Peters, {Carl E.} and Peters, {Jonathan R.} and Cameron Gordon",
    year = "2017",
    doi = "10.3141/2670-04",
    language = "English",
    volume = "2670",
    pages = "24--32",
    journal = "Transportation Research Record",
    issn = "0361-1981",
    publisher = "US National Research Council",

    }

    Who should pay for local streets? Who does? Survey of New Jersey municipalities. / Peters, Carl E.; Peters, Jonathan R.; Gordon, Cameron.

    In: Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2670, 2017, p. 24-32.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Who should pay for local streets? Who does? Survey of New Jersey municipalities

    AU - Peters, Carl E.

    AU - Peters, Jonathan R.

    AU - Gordon, Cameron

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - Many trips, if not most, begin and end on local roads. Thus, there is a system aspect to such roads in the sense that local streets can have spillover benefits and costs for larger trips that use the total road network. Yet curbs and sidewalks and local streets are typically almost entirely provided locally in the United States. There are historical and institutional reasons for this fact and great variation of practice across jurisdictions. But two key planning and policy questions arise. Who pays for sidewalks and local streets? And who should pay? To find some empirical answers to those questions, this paper reports on a 2015 New Jersey Society of Municipal Engineers survey, developed by one of the authors, to collect data on the prevalence of curb and sidewalk installations on municipal streets. The survey explored the management and operational practices that municipal governments use to maintain their local transportation infrastructure. The results indicate that local streets in New Jersey are heavily funded and managed by localities with little focus on any broader network effects that might accrue outside those localities. Analysis of the data suggests a need of more than $1.2 billion annually in New Jersey, against a projected state and federal funding of roughly $100 million annually, a gap in funding that suggests the need to establish a long-term funding mechanism for local streets, curbs, and sidewalks.

    AB - Many trips, if not most, begin and end on local roads. Thus, there is a system aspect to such roads in the sense that local streets can have spillover benefits and costs for larger trips that use the total road network. Yet curbs and sidewalks and local streets are typically almost entirely provided locally in the United States. There are historical and institutional reasons for this fact and great variation of practice across jurisdictions. But two key planning and policy questions arise. Who pays for sidewalks and local streets? And who should pay? To find some empirical answers to those questions, this paper reports on a 2015 New Jersey Society of Municipal Engineers survey, developed by one of the authors, to collect data on the prevalence of curb and sidewalk installations on municipal streets. The survey explored the management and operational practices that municipal governments use to maintain their local transportation infrastructure. The results indicate that local streets in New Jersey are heavily funded and managed by localities with little focus on any broader network effects that might accrue outside those localities. Analysis of the data suggests a need of more than $1.2 billion annually in New Jersey, against a projected state and federal funding of roughly $100 million annually, a gap in funding that suggests the need to establish a long-term funding mechanism for local streets, curbs, and sidewalks.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033798018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.3141/2670-04

    DO - 10.3141/2670-04

    M3 - Article

    VL - 2670

    SP - 24

    EP - 32

    JO - Transportation Research Record

    JF - Transportation Research Record

    SN - 0361-1981

    ER -