Who speaks, and in what voice?

The challenge of engaging 'the public' in health policy decision-making

John Boswell, Catherine Settle, Anni DUGDALE

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite widespread calls for greater public involvement in governance, especially in relation to health policy, significant challenges remain in identifying any such legitimate ‘public’ voice. This research investigates this problem through a case study. It examines how actors experienced and interpreted a government-commissioned citizen’s jury on health spending prioritization in relation to the work of the local health care consumers’ organization. The analysis highlights an unproductive tension around this encounter, and points to more complementary ways in which such top–down and bottom–up efforts might be coordinated. It, therefore, contributes significantly to efforts to strengthen the public voice in contemporary health governance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1358-1374
Number of pages17
JournalPublic Management Review
Volume17
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Decision making
Health
Health care
Governance
Health policy
Public involvement
Top-down
Citizens' jury
Prioritization
Health spending
Healthcare
Government
Bottom-up

Cite this

Boswell, John ; Settle, Catherine ; DUGDALE, Anni. / Who speaks, and in what voice? The challenge of engaging 'the public' in health policy decision-making. In: Public Management Review. 2015 ; Vol. 17, No. 9. pp. 1358-1374.
@article{6e4fd0843a964159b812c25f0617ed5e,
title = "Who speaks, and in what voice?: The challenge of engaging 'the public' in health policy decision-making",
abstract = "Despite widespread calls for greater public involvement in governance, especially in relation to health policy, significant challenges remain in identifying any such legitimate ‘public’ voice. This research investigates this problem through a case study. It examines how actors experienced and interpreted a government-commissioned citizen’s jury on health spending prioritization in relation to the work of the local health care consumers’ organization. The analysis highlights an unproductive tension around this encounter, and points to more complementary ways in which such top–down and bottom–up efforts might be coordinated. It, therefore, contributes significantly to efforts to strengthen the public voice in contemporary health governance.",
keywords = "citizen’s juries, dramaturgical analysis, health care consumers, health governance, Public engagement",
author = "John Boswell and Catherine Settle and Anni DUGDALE",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/14719037.2014.943269",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "1358--1374",
journal = "Public Management Review",
issn = "1461-667X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "9",

}

Who speaks, and in what voice? The challenge of engaging 'the public' in health policy decision-making. / Boswell, John; Settle, Catherine; DUGDALE, Anni.

In: Public Management Review, Vol. 17, No. 9, 2015, p. 1358-1374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who speaks, and in what voice?

T2 - The challenge of engaging 'the public' in health policy decision-making

AU - Boswell, John

AU - Settle, Catherine

AU - DUGDALE, Anni

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Despite widespread calls for greater public involvement in governance, especially in relation to health policy, significant challenges remain in identifying any such legitimate ‘public’ voice. This research investigates this problem through a case study. It examines how actors experienced and interpreted a government-commissioned citizen’s jury on health spending prioritization in relation to the work of the local health care consumers’ organization. The analysis highlights an unproductive tension around this encounter, and points to more complementary ways in which such top–down and bottom–up efforts might be coordinated. It, therefore, contributes significantly to efforts to strengthen the public voice in contemporary health governance.

AB - Despite widespread calls for greater public involvement in governance, especially in relation to health policy, significant challenges remain in identifying any such legitimate ‘public’ voice. This research investigates this problem through a case study. It examines how actors experienced and interpreted a government-commissioned citizen’s jury on health spending prioritization in relation to the work of the local health care consumers’ organization. The analysis highlights an unproductive tension around this encounter, and points to more complementary ways in which such top–down and bottom–up efforts might be coordinated. It, therefore, contributes significantly to efforts to strengthen the public voice in contemporary health governance.

KW - citizen’s juries

KW - dramaturgical analysis

KW - health care consumers

KW - health governance

KW - Public engagement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940796666&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/speaks-voice-challenge-engaging-public-health-policy-decisionmaking

U2 - 10.1080/14719037.2014.943269

DO - 10.1080/14719037.2014.943269

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 1358

EP - 1374

JO - Public Management Review

JF - Public Management Review

SN - 1461-667X

IS - 9

ER -