Why and How Urban Residents Resisted a Proposed Gas-Fired Power Station

Carmel Anderson, Jacki SCHIRMER

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    New urban infrastructure including lower-carbon energy facilities are increasingly met with community resistance during the public participation phase of planning. Resistance can confound the implementation of government climate change and energy policies. A qualitative case study using social capital and place-attachment analytical lenses is conducted to build knowledge about the social factors involved in a Canberra community's resistance to a gas-fired power station. Analysis reveals that while social capital explains how resistance occurred, a threatened disruption to place attachment explains why. We conclude that public participation processes informed by community social capital and place attachment characteristics would help developers and planners pre-empt resistance.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)324-339
    Number of pages16
    JournalUrban Policy and Research
    Volume33
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    social capital
    power plant
    resident
    gas
    energy policy
    community
    infrastructure
    participation
    climate change
    carbon
    social factors
    energy
    planning
    public participation

    Cite this

    @article{c1bc09650c0143e1ab556bf050f2c893,
    title = "Why and How Urban Residents Resisted a Proposed Gas-Fired Power Station",
    abstract = "New urban infrastructure including lower-carbon energy facilities are increasingly met with community resistance during the public participation phase of planning. Resistance can confound the implementation of government climate change and energy policies. A qualitative case study using social capital and place-attachment analytical lenses is conducted to build knowledge about the social factors involved in a Canberra community's resistance to a gas-fired power station. Analysis reveals that while social capital explains how resistance occurred, a threatened disruption to place attachment explains why. We conclude that public participation processes informed by community social capital and place attachment characteristics would help developers and planners pre-empt resistance.",
    author = "Carmel Anderson and Jacki SCHIRMER",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1080/08111146.2014.982792",
    language = "English",
    volume = "33",
    pages = "324--339",
    journal = "Urban Policy and Research",
    issn = "0811-1146",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "3",

    }

    Why and How Urban Residents Resisted a Proposed Gas-Fired Power Station. / Anderson, Carmel; SCHIRMER, Jacki.

    In: Urban Policy and Research, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2015, p. 324-339.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Why and How Urban Residents Resisted a Proposed Gas-Fired Power Station

    AU - Anderson, Carmel

    AU - SCHIRMER, Jacki

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - New urban infrastructure including lower-carbon energy facilities are increasingly met with community resistance during the public participation phase of planning. Resistance can confound the implementation of government climate change and energy policies. A qualitative case study using social capital and place-attachment analytical lenses is conducted to build knowledge about the social factors involved in a Canberra community's resistance to a gas-fired power station. Analysis reveals that while social capital explains how resistance occurred, a threatened disruption to place attachment explains why. We conclude that public participation processes informed by community social capital and place attachment characteristics would help developers and planners pre-empt resistance.

    AB - New urban infrastructure including lower-carbon energy facilities are increasingly met with community resistance during the public participation phase of planning. Resistance can confound the implementation of government climate change and energy policies. A qualitative case study using social capital and place-attachment analytical lenses is conducted to build knowledge about the social factors involved in a Canberra community's resistance to a gas-fired power station. Analysis reveals that while social capital explains how resistance occurred, a threatened disruption to place attachment explains why. We conclude that public participation processes informed by community social capital and place attachment characteristics would help developers and planners pre-empt resistance.

    U2 - 10.1080/08111146.2014.982792

    DO - 10.1080/08111146.2014.982792

    M3 - Article

    VL - 33

    SP - 324

    EP - 339

    JO - Urban Policy and Research

    JF - Urban Policy and Research

    SN - 0811-1146

    IS - 3

    ER -