Why is it so difficult to reform some Asian bureaucracies? Building theory from Cambodian evidence

Mark TURNER

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)
12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article demonstrates how theory can be built to explain cases of public administration reform failure in Asia. Drawing on the methodologies of middle range theory and grounded theory, qualitative data are gathered from the case of Cambodia and then analyzed. The result is the proposition that a specific constellation of reform-inhibiting factors explains the slow progress of public administration reform in Cambodia. At the center of the constellation is patronage. The cluster of surrounding and interrelated factors includes weak accountability, hegemonic political regime, high and legitimate power distance, low wages, and bureaucratic dysfunction. The chances of reform success increase with the removal or absence of these inhibiting factors. The analysis emphasizes the importance of political economy factors in determining the success or failure of public administration reform
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)275-285
Number of pages11
JournalPublic Administration and Development
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

public administration
bureaucracy
reform
Cambodia
evidence
accountability
political economy
wage
political regime
low wage
clientelism
grounded theory
methodology
responsibility

Cite this

@article{9035c0ee5e014cadbeab53f4aa30a12e,
title = "Why is it so difficult to reform some Asian bureaucracies? Building theory from Cambodian evidence",
abstract = "This article demonstrates how theory can be built to explain cases of public administration reform failure in Asia. Drawing on the methodologies of middle range theory and grounded theory, qualitative data are gathered from the case of Cambodia and then analyzed. The result is the proposition that a specific constellation of reform-inhibiting factors explains the slow progress of public administration reform in Cambodia. At the center of the constellation is patronage. The cluster of surrounding and interrelated factors includes weak accountability, hegemonic political regime, high and legitimate power distance, low wages, and bureaucratic dysfunction. The chances of reform success increase with the removal or absence of these inhibiting factors. The analysis emphasizes the importance of political economy factors in determining the success or failure of public administration reform",
keywords = "Asia bureaucracy, Building theory, Bureaucracy, Cambodia, Public administration reform",
author = "Mark TURNER",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1002/pad.1655",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "275--285",
journal = "Public Administration and Development",
issn = "0271-2075",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "4",

}

Why is it so difficult to reform some Asian bureaucracies? Building theory from Cambodian evidence. / TURNER, Mark.

In: Public Administration and Development, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2013, p. 275-285.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why is it so difficult to reform some Asian bureaucracies? Building theory from Cambodian evidence

AU - TURNER, Mark

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This article demonstrates how theory can be built to explain cases of public administration reform failure in Asia. Drawing on the methodologies of middle range theory and grounded theory, qualitative data are gathered from the case of Cambodia and then analyzed. The result is the proposition that a specific constellation of reform-inhibiting factors explains the slow progress of public administration reform in Cambodia. At the center of the constellation is patronage. The cluster of surrounding and interrelated factors includes weak accountability, hegemonic political regime, high and legitimate power distance, low wages, and bureaucratic dysfunction. The chances of reform success increase with the removal or absence of these inhibiting factors. The analysis emphasizes the importance of political economy factors in determining the success or failure of public administration reform

AB - This article demonstrates how theory can be built to explain cases of public administration reform failure in Asia. Drawing on the methodologies of middle range theory and grounded theory, qualitative data are gathered from the case of Cambodia and then analyzed. The result is the proposition that a specific constellation of reform-inhibiting factors explains the slow progress of public administration reform in Cambodia. At the center of the constellation is patronage. The cluster of surrounding and interrelated factors includes weak accountability, hegemonic political regime, high and legitimate power distance, low wages, and bureaucratic dysfunction. The chances of reform success increase with the removal or absence of these inhibiting factors. The analysis emphasizes the importance of political economy factors in determining the success or failure of public administration reform

KW - Asia bureaucracy

KW - Building theory

KW - Bureaucracy

KW - Cambodia

KW - Public administration reform

U2 - 10.1002/pad.1655

DO - 10.1002/pad.1655

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 275

EP - 285

JO - Public Administration and Development

JF - Public Administration and Development

SN - 0271-2075

IS - 4

ER -