Why this Australian Supported Germany to Win the World Cup

Research output: Contribution to Newspaper/Magazine/BulletinArticle

Abstract

When I was asked for my tips ahead of the 2014 FIFA men’s football World Cup
finals, I put on record that I hoped that Germany would reign supreme (Ordway,
2014). I appreciate that it is not very patriotic for an Australian to not only
acknowledge that our team was the lowest ranked coming into the tournament, and to also propose a novel rationale for supporting Germany ahead of other favoured contenders. Going into the final, Germany had earned a FIFA ranking of number 2, undoubtedly assisted by having one of the best national premier leagues in the world, so they represent a solid pick. However, football skills are only one factor to consider when determining a tournament-winning formula. The predictor methodologies outlined by University of Canberra Adjunct Professor Lyons in his The Conversation articles (Lyons, 2014a, 2014b), are compelling. This analysis, however, assumes that all matches are played to the highest standard, and all athletes play to the best of their ability. Purist
performance analysis does not take into account that teams may deliberately ‘throw’ matches to assist their progression through the tournament (tanking2), or deliberately fix elements of the match (e.g., red cards, penalties) or otherwise the overall outcome of the match. My prediction, therefore, was not based on any hard quantitative analysis of performance, but rather, on my understanding of the German approach to corruption, and match-fixing particularly. The question is whether this vigilant, zero tolerance approach to match-fixing translates into a culture of integrity in German sport and the national football team.
Original languageEnglish
Pages6-13
Number of pages8
Volume6
No.2
Specialist publicationSport & EU Review
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2014

Fingerprint

athlete
corruption
tolerance
integrity
ranking
penalty
Sports
conversation
university teacher
methodology
ability
performance

Cite this

@misc{45f9e0ef037942b68a2df2be32a9d7a1,
title = "Why this Australian Supported Germany to Win the World Cup",
abstract = "When I was asked for my tips ahead of the 2014 FIFA men’s football World Cupfinals, I put on record that I hoped that Germany would reign supreme (Ordway,2014). I appreciate that it is not very patriotic for an Australian to not onlyacknowledge that our team was the lowest ranked coming into the tournament, and to also propose a novel rationale for supporting Germany ahead of other favoured contenders. Going into the final, Germany had earned a FIFA ranking of number 2, undoubtedly assisted by having one of the best national premier leagues in the world, so they represent a solid pick. However, football skills are only one factor to consider when determining a tournament-winning formula. The predictor methodologies outlined by University of Canberra Adjunct Professor Lyons in his The Conversation articles (Lyons, 2014a, 2014b), are compelling. This analysis, however, assumes that all matches are played to the highest standard, and all athletes play to the best of their ability. Puristperformance analysis does not take into account that teams may deliberately ‘throw’ matches to assist their progression through the tournament (tanking2), or deliberately fix elements of the match (e.g., red cards, penalties) or otherwise the overall outcome of the match. My prediction, therefore, was not based on any hard quantitative analysis of performance, but rather, on my understanding of the German approach to corruption, and match-fixing particularly. The question is whether this vigilant, zero tolerance approach to match-fixing translates into a culture of integrity in German sport and the national football team.",
author = "Catherine ORDWAY",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "6--13",
journal = "Sport & EU Review",
issn = "1754-1298",
publisher = "Association for the Study of Sport and the European Union",

}

Why this Australian Supported Germany to Win the World Cup. / ORDWAY, Catherine.

In: Sport & EU Review, Vol. 6, No. 2, 08.2014, p. 6-13.

Research output: Contribution to Newspaper/Magazine/BulletinArticle

TY - GEN

T1 - Why this Australian Supported Germany to Win the World Cup

AU - ORDWAY, Catherine

PY - 2014/8

Y1 - 2014/8

N2 - When I was asked for my tips ahead of the 2014 FIFA men’s football World Cupfinals, I put on record that I hoped that Germany would reign supreme (Ordway,2014). I appreciate that it is not very patriotic for an Australian to not onlyacknowledge that our team was the lowest ranked coming into the tournament, and to also propose a novel rationale for supporting Germany ahead of other favoured contenders. Going into the final, Germany had earned a FIFA ranking of number 2, undoubtedly assisted by having one of the best national premier leagues in the world, so they represent a solid pick. However, football skills are only one factor to consider when determining a tournament-winning formula. The predictor methodologies outlined by University of Canberra Adjunct Professor Lyons in his The Conversation articles (Lyons, 2014a, 2014b), are compelling. This analysis, however, assumes that all matches are played to the highest standard, and all athletes play to the best of their ability. Puristperformance analysis does not take into account that teams may deliberately ‘throw’ matches to assist their progression through the tournament (tanking2), or deliberately fix elements of the match (e.g., red cards, penalties) or otherwise the overall outcome of the match. My prediction, therefore, was not based on any hard quantitative analysis of performance, but rather, on my understanding of the German approach to corruption, and match-fixing particularly. The question is whether this vigilant, zero tolerance approach to match-fixing translates into a culture of integrity in German sport and the national football team.

AB - When I was asked for my tips ahead of the 2014 FIFA men’s football World Cupfinals, I put on record that I hoped that Germany would reign supreme (Ordway,2014). I appreciate that it is not very patriotic for an Australian to not onlyacknowledge that our team was the lowest ranked coming into the tournament, and to also propose a novel rationale for supporting Germany ahead of other favoured contenders. Going into the final, Germany had earned a FIFA ranking of number 2, undoubtedly assisted by having one of the best national premier leagues in the world, so they represent a solid pick. However, football skills are only one factor to consider when determining a tournament-winning formula. The predictor methodologies outlined by University of Canberra Adjunct Professor Lyons in his The Conversation articles (Lyons, 2014a, 2014b), are compelling. This analysis, however, assumes that all matches are played to the highest standard, and all athletes play to the best of their ability. Puristperformance analysis does not take into account that teams may deliberately ‘throw’ matches to assist their progression through the tournament (tanking2), or deliberately fix elements of the match (e.g., red cards, penalties) or otherwise the overall outcome of the match. My prediction, therefore, was not based on any hard quantitative analysis of performance, but rather, on my understanding of the German approach to corruption, and match-fixing particularly. The question is whether this vigilant, zero tolerance approach to match-fixing translates into a culture of integrity in German sport and the national football team.

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 6

EP - 13

JO - Sport & EU Review

JF - Sport & EU Review

SN - 1754-1298

ER -