Women's lived experience of intimate partner violence during pregnancy

The Baby Friendly Health Initiative in Australia – twenty years on

Marjorie ATCHAN, Deborah DAVIS, Maralyn Foureur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Australia’s health care policy in relation to breastfeeding includes in-principle support for the Baby Friendly Health Initiative (BFHI). The BFHI is an evidence based quality assurance program that has shown a positive effect on breastfeeding practices, more so on initiation than duration. Currently
seventy-four maternity facilities (19%) are accredited as ‘baby friendly’; there is ongoing interest in initial accreditation and many facilities have achieved multiple reaccreditations; however there is an unknown degree of implementation by individual hospitals. The numbers of currently accredited facilities across states/territories also varies. Several Australian studies have revealed the existence of multi-level barriers. Competition for health funding, selective prioritisation by managers, plus skill deficits and negative attitudes of individual health professionals appears to hamper widespread knowledge translation into practice. Aim: to examine the factors influencing the operationalising of an evidence-based, global, health-promotion strategy, in a national setting, twenty years post-implementation. Methods: a case study research (CSR) approach was used to examine the influences on BFHI operationalisation twenty years post-implementation. CSR requires a range of data to be collected to confirm findings. In this study relevant literature, archival data and in depth individual interviews with key stakeholders have been analysed. Findings: stakeholders shared their unique perspective and assessment of the challenges that have influenced the sustainability of the Initiative in Australia. There was consensus on the lack of commitment to and understanding of the Initiative by policy makers, health professionals, health administrators and clinicians. Opinion differed however on the currency and usefulness of the BFHI to the Australian context, in its current form.
Implications: the BFHI is a well evidenced strategy which continues to be hampered by a lack of comprehensive support. Implementing strategies to improve BFHI’s ‘fit’ in the Australian context may better facilitate the translation of research into practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S7
Number of pages1
JournalWomen and Birth
Volume28
Issue numberS1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Event“Super Midwives: Making a Difference”: Australian College of Midwives 19th Biennial Conference - Convenbtion Centre, Gold Coast Queensland, Australia
Duration: 5 Oct 20158 Oct 2015

Fingerprint

Pregnancy
Breast Feeding
Administrative Personnel
Health
Research
Attitude to Health
Translational Medical Research
Accreditation
Health Policy
Health Promotion
Consensus
Infant Health
Intimate Partner Violence
Interviews
Delivery of Health Care

Cite this

@article{16528f5cab6b46b0b56022ebeb6622a0,
title = "Women's lived experience of intimate partner violence during pregnancy: The Baby Friendly Health Initiative in Australia – twenty years on",
abstract = "Introduction: Australia’s health care policy in relation to breastfeeding includes in-principle support for the Baby Friendly Health Initiative (BFHI). The BFHI is an evidence based quality assurance program that has shown a positive effect on breastfeeding practices, more so on initiation than duration. Currentlyseventy-four maternity facilities (19{\%}) are accredited as ‘baby friendly’; there is ongoing interest in initial accreditation and many facilities have achieved multiple reaccreditations; however there is an unknown degree of implementation by individual hospitals. The numbers of currently accredited facilities across states/territories also varies. Several Australian studies have revealed the existence of multi-level barriers. Competition for health funding, selective prioritisation by managers, plus skill deficits and negative attitudes of individual health professionals appears to hamper widespread knowledge translation into practice. Aim: to examine the factors influencing the operationalising of an evidence-based, global, health-promotion strategy, in a national setting, twenty years post-implementation. Methods: a case study research (CSR) approach was used to examine the influences on BFHI operationalisation twenty years post-implementation. CSR requires a range of data to be collected to confirm findings. In this study relevant literature, archival data and in depth individual interviews with key stakeholders have been analysed. Findings: stakeholders shared their unique perspective and assessment of the challenges that have influenced the sustainability of the Initiative in Australia. There was consensus on the lack of commitment to and understanding of the Initiative by policy makers, health professionals, health administrators and clinicians. Opinion differed however on the currency and usefulness of the BFHI to the Australian context, in its current form.Implications: the BFHI is a well evidenced strategy which continues to be hampered by a lack of comprehensive support. Implementing strategies to improve BFHI’s ‘fit’ in the Australian context may better facilitate the translation of research into practice.",
author = "Marjorie ATCHAN and Deborah DAVIS and Maralyn Foureur",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.wombi.2015.07.035",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "S7",
journal = "Australian journal of midwifery : professional journal of the Australian College of Midwives Incorporated",
issn = "1871-5192",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "S1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Women's lived experience of intimate partner violence during pregnancy

T2 - The Baby Friendly Health Initiative in Australia – twenty years on

AU - ATCHAN, Marjorie

AU - DAVIS, Deborah

AU - Foureur, Maralyn

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Introduction: Australia’s health care policy in relation to breastfeeding includes in-principle support for the Baby Friendly Health Initiative (BFHI). The BFHI is an evidence based quality assurance program that has shown a positive effect on breastfeeding practices, more so on initiation than duration. Currentlyseventy-four maternity facilities (19%) are accredited as ‘baby friendly’; there is ongoing interest in initial accreditation and many facilities have achieved multiple reaccreditations; however there is an unknown degree of implementation by individual hospitals. The numbers of currently accredited facilities across states/territories also varies. Several Australian studies have revealed the existence of multi-level barriers. Competition for health funding, selective prioritisation by managers, plus skill deficits and negative attitudes of individual health professionals appears to hamper widespread knowledge translation into practice. Aim: to examine the factors influencing the operationalising of an evidence-based, global, health-promotion strategy, in a national setting, twenty years post-implementation. Methods: a case study research (CSR) approach was used to examine the influences on BFHI operationalisation twenty years post-implementation. CSR requires a range of data to be collected to confirm findings. In this study relevant literature, archival data and in depth individual interviews with key stakeholders have been analysed. Findings: stakeholders shared their unique perspective and assessment of the challenges that have influenced the sustainability of the Initiative in Australia. There was consensus on the lack of commitment to and understanding of the Initiative by policy makers, health professionals, health administrators and clinicians. Opinion differed however on the currency and usefulness of the BFHI to the Australian context, in its current form.Implications: the BFHI is a well evidenced strategy which continues to be hampered by a lack of comprehensive support. Implementing strategies to improve BFHI’s ‘fit’ in the Australian context may better facilitate the translation of research into practice.

AB - Introduction: Australia’s health care policy in relation to breastfeeding includes in-principle support for the Baby Friendly Health Initiative (BFHI). The BFHI is an evidence based quality assurance program that has shown a positive effect on breastfeeding practices, more so on initiation than duration. Currentlyseventy-four maternity facilities (19%) are accredited as ‘baby friendly’; there is ongoing interest in initial accreditation and many facilities have achieved multiple reaccreditations; however there is an unknown degree of implementation by individual hospitals. The numbers of currently accredited facilities across states/territories also varies. Several Australian studies have revealed the existence of multi-level barriers. Competition for health funding, selective prioritisation by managers, plus skill deficits and negative attitudes of individual health professionals appears to hamper widespread knowledge translation into practice. Aim: to examine the factors influencing the operationalising of an evidence-based, global, health-promotion strategy, in a national setting, twenty years post-implementation. Methods: a case study research (CSR) approach was used to examine the influences on BFHI operationalisation twenty years post-implementation. CSR requires a range of data to be collected to confirm findings. In this study relevant literature, archival data and in depth individual interviews with key stakeholders have been analysed. Findings: stakeholders shared their unique perspective and assessment of the challenges that have influenced the sustainability of the Initiative in Australia. There was consensus on the lack of commitment to and understanding of the Initiative by policy makers, health professionals, health administrators and clinicians. Opinion differed however on the currency and usefulness of the BFHI to the Australian context, in its current form.Implications: the BFHI is a well evidenced strategy which continues to be hampered by a lack of comprehensive support. Implementing strategies to improve BFHI’s ‘fit’ in the Australian context may better facilitate the translation of research into practice.

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871519215001110

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/womens-lived-experience-intimate-partner-violence-during-pregnancy

U2 - 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.07.035

DO - 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.07.035

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - S7

JO - Australian journal of midwifery : professional journal of the Australian College of Midwives Incorporated

JF - Australian journal of midwifery : professional journal of the Australian College of Midwives Incorporated

SN - 1871-5192

IS - S1

ER -