Worrying about climate change: Is it responsible to promote public debate?

Helen BERRY, Dominic PEEL

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Some fear that provoking widespread worry about climate change may harm mental health. The Regional Wellbeing Survey, a large study of health, well-being and life in rural and regional Australia, examined climate change worry and attitudes. Most respondents were worried about climate change and agreed that fossil fuel use causes global warming, but there was no evidence to suggest that worry about climate change is linked to mental health in the general population. Respectful, calm, considered public debate about how to respond to climate change is unlikely to be harmful to population mental health. Individually focused clinical approaches are unlikely to be effective as a primary approach in managing the mental health impacts of climate change. Instead, collective, systems-based approaches will be needed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)31-32
    Number of pages2
    JournalBJ Psych International
    Volume12
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    mental health
    climate change
    global warming
    fossil
    climate
    public

    Cite this

    @article{2cbaa9fb0281431691434c1e57bdc0f3,
    title = "Worrying about climate change: Is it responsible to promote public debate?",
    abstract = "Some fear that provoking widespread worry about climate change may harm mental health. The Regional Wellbeing Survey, a large study of health, well-being and life in rural and regional Australia, examined climate change worry and attitudes. Most respondents were worried about climate change and agreed that fossil fuel use causes global warming, but there was no evidence to suggest that worry about climate change is linked to mental health in the general population. Respectful, calm, considered public debate about how to respond to climate change is unlikely to be harmful to population mental health. Individually focused clinical approaches are unlikely to be effective as a primary approach in managing the mental health impacts of climate change. Instead, collective, systems-based approaches will be needed.",
    keywords = "Climate change, Psychiatrist",
    author = "Helen BERRY and Dominic PEEL",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1192/S2056474000000234",
    language = "English",
    volume = "12",
    pages = "31--32",
    journal = "BJ Psych International",
    issn = "2056-4740",
    number = "2",

    }

    Worrying about climate change: Is it responsible to promote public debate? / BERRY, Helen; PEEL, Dominic.

    In: BJ Psych International, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2015, p. 31-32.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Worrying about climate change: Is it responsible to promote public debate?

    AU - BERRY, Helen

    AU - PEEL, Dominic

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Some fear that provoking widespread worry about climate change may harm mental health. The Regional Wellbeing Survey, a large study of health, well-being and life in rural and regional Australia, examined climate change worry and attitudes. Most respondents were worried about climate change and agreed that fossil fuel use causes global warming, but there was no evidence to suggest that worry about climate change is linked to mental health in the general population. Respectful, calm, considered public debate about how to respond to climate change is unlikely to be harmful to population mental health. Individually focused clinical approaches are unlikely to be effective as a primary approach in managing the mental health impacts of climate change. Instead, collective, systems-based approaches will be needed.

    AB - Some fear that provoking widespread worry about climate change may harm mental health. The Regional Wellbeing Survey, a large study of health, well-being and life in rural and regional Australia, examined climate change worry and attitudes. Most respondents were worried about climate change and agreed that fossil fuel use causes global warming, but there was no evidence to suggest that worry about climate change is linked to mental health in the general population. Respectful, calm, considered public debate about how to respond to climate change is unlikely to be harmful to population mental health. Individually focused clinical approaches are unlikely to be effective as a primary approach in managing the mental health impacts of climate change. Instead, collective, systems-based approaches will be needed.

    KW - Climate change

    KW - Psychiatrist

    U2 - 10.1192/S2056474000000234

    DO - 10.1192/S2056474000000234

    M3 - Article

    VL - 12

    SP - 31

    EP - 32

    JO - BJ Psych International

    JF - BJ Psych International

    SN - 2056-4740

    IS - 2

    ER -