Yes, rolling averages are a good way to assess training load for injury prevention. Is there a better way? Probably, but we have not seen the evidence

M. K. Drew, P. Blanch, C. Purdam, T. J. Gabbett

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The acute:chronic workload ratio (ACWR) is evidence based1 ,2 and is strongly supported by the available literature.3 Other models of injury risk have yet to show such support.
LanguageEnglish
Pages 618-619
Number of pages2
JournalBritish Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume51
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2017

Fingerprint

Workload
Wounds and Injuries

Cite this

@article{8b1fc6c2509f4e0ca343c5f87b632a11,
title = "Yes, rolling averages are a good way to assess training load for injury prevention. Is there a better way? Probably, but we have not seen the evidence",
abstract = "The acute:chronic workload ratio (ACWR) is evidence based1 ,2 and is strongly supported by the available literature.3 Other models of injury risk have yet to show such support.",
author = "Drew, {M. K.} and P. Blanch and C. Purdam and Gabbett, {T. J.}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bjsports-2016-096609",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "618--619",
journal = "British Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "0306-3674",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "7",

}

Yes, rolling averages are a good way to assess training load for injury prevention. Is there a better way? Probably, but we have not seen the evidence. / Drew, M. K.; Blanch, P.; Purdam, C.; Gabbett, T. J.

In: British Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 51, No. 7, 01.04.2017, p. 618-619.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

TY - JOUR

T1 - Yes, rolling averages are a good way to assess training load for injury prevention. Is there a better way? Probably, but we have not seen the evidence

AU - Drew, M. K.

AU - Blanch, P.

AU - Purdam, C.

AU - Gabbett, T. J.

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - The acute:chronic workload ratio (ACWR) is evidence based1 ,2 and is strongly supported by the available literature.3 Other models of injury risk have yet to show such support.

AB - The acute:chronic workload ratio (ACWR) is evidence based1 ,2 and is strongly supported by the available literature.3 Other models of injury risk have yet to show such support.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988527283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096609

DO - 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096609

M3 - Letter

VL - 51

SP - 618

EP - 619

JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine

T2 - British Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 0306-3674

IS - 7

ER -